payday loans vicodin viagra online

Swine flu hogwash and the mass media

So have you heard about this Swine Flu thing? Of course you have. The WHO and the CDC’s of the world combined with the CNN’s and CBC’s have made it impossible not to. Each time I turn on my TV or computer, pick up a newspaper or do anything at all to interact with civilization I find myself being updated on what’s new with it. Even tech blogs and podcasts, where I spend most of my time have gotten into the act of telling us more and more about this perilous threat to the future of civilization. And let’s not even get into the fine role twitter is playing in spreading the “news”.

Now we’ve all seen movies about the outbreak that brings down humanity as we know it (I think 12 Monkeys might be my fav), but will the Swine Flu ultimately be the undoing of this fragile race known as humanity? I’m calling Vegas and putting my money on “no”. I did a little research (ok, a quick Google search) and found that in fact the regular old “People Flu”, among many other ailments, are much more likely to kill you than this latest menace.

So why all the fuss? Because while everyone knows the adage “sex sells”, in the news media, there’s one thing that sells even better – fear. While this has always been the case (remember that CNN made its name covering the first Gulf War 24/7), in a world where media is fragmenting so rapidly, it takes a galvanizing sort of fear to really bring eyeballs to mass media in meaningful numbers. Enter, the swine…

Are these guys going to bring down society?  Dont bet on it.

Are these guys going to bring down society? Don't bet on it.

Swine Flu is essentially a break from the last eight months of wall to wall reporting on these depressing economic times. Other than the occasional Obama-inspired story of optimism sprinkled in, the mainstream media has been pulling up its ratings by scaring the crap out of us, reminding us how we’re all going to lose our jobs as capitalism hits the toilet. When the WHO recently raised its Swine Flu alertness level from “3″ to “4″ (I have no idea what this, in fact, means) a new panic bell went off. One that mainstream media was more than happy to capitalize on.

Let’s be honest, as a society, we’re generally pretty passive. We like to believe all is well so we can go about our day, go to our jobs, watch a little TV, maybe go out for dinner – basically not worry about anything if we don’t have to. However, when the opportunity to worry – for whatever reason – presents itself, the average person will raise an eyebrow. When this worry is attached to the word “pandemic”, our docile society feels compelled to stay tuned to CNN to wait for the cue to stock up on water and dry goods, sound the doomsday siren and head to the bomb shelter.

So why the overexposure? There’s no longer an appetite for niche content in the mainstream media. Blogs and other smaller outlets have taken over that function. When people want information on a specific topic, they fire up their trusty Google and look for the expert who will bring it to them. This has lead mass media down an increasingly desperate path to drum up mass audience through the prospect of crisis that effects us at an individual level. As niche content spreads itself thinly across the interwebs, the phenomenon is only amplified. The mainstream folks need to find something that’s going to grab and hold the interest of this passive bunch we call society en mass. And what better angle than something that takes away your livelihood, your life or the life of someone you love?!? It’s certainly worth more than an eyebrow raise to the Average Joe, and for the newsnets, it means those eyebrows will be raising collectively to watch their coverage. Check mate.

Remember the Avian Flu? Y2K? In spite of endless, intensive media coverage, we’re still here. Swine Flu is just the latest in a long line of scare tactics that you can expect to continue. They’ve always said that advertising is based solely on fear, but more and more, mainstream media is trending the same way. If this post wasn’t enough to convince you otherwise, maybe you should just head down to the bomb shelter, lay off the bacon, and poke your head out in about 3 months. We should be all clear by then…

  • spanish flu

    While no this isnt as news worthy as it has seemingly become. The reason why SwineFlue and Avian Flu, Sars and other outbreaks or irregular illnesses become big news is that the Spanish flue that came shortly after WWI killed between 50 and 100million people. thats from what i understand way more people then live in canada alone. with a mortality rate of between 2.5 and 5%. Since then any outbreak of something that has an over 1% fatality rate is deemed NEWS worthy.

    Im suprisded a marketing company can not see the difference between everyday illnesses that kill larger amounts of people then up and comming illnesses that have yet to show what their truely made of.

    While it is not likely this will become the next spanish flu, the fact its being so widely reported has nothing to do with what the media has been reporting in recent months but more to do with the fact a flu has the possibility of killing over 100million people.

    As a marketer you should know only so much of what you tell people sinks in. well the same is true for all information not just what you try and sell people. the more you dominate people with a message the more they will learn about said message.

    i look forward to hearing every little update on this flu

  • http://www.nitch.ca Andrew Lane

    Thanks for your comment. I appreciate that there have been many cases in human history of true pandemics, which is tragic, but Spanish Flu broke out almost 100 years ago in a time when the world was far less connected, sanitation was at very different levels and the medical community was far less advanced and collaborative. These are huge advantages in disease control our society has over the post WWI world. Spanish Flu would likely have killed millions before the news even reached many people.
    But this post wasn’t about medicine or the protocols that organizations like the WHO use to keep us safe (which they do a fine job of). I wrote this to illustrate that this story has become overexposed (as you acknowledge) because of the need for mass media to attract audience. Clearly, this is an effective strategy (as you also acknowledge). I simply wanted to present to people the idea that because something scary is on the news 24/7, it doesn’t mean you need to live your life in fear of it 24/7.
    In the end, the news media is a commercial operation and they make their money by holding our interest. If you wish to follow the story closely, you’re certainly entitled. I just felt there was another side to the coverage worth expressing.

  • http://www.christindal.ca/ Chris Tindal
  • http://www.nitch.ca Andrew Lane

    Interesting – thanks Chris!

  • http://www.christindal.ca/ Chris Tindal
  • Martin Sieg

    The thing scares people, including scientists who understand what’s going on, is that Bird Flu and Swine Flu have crossed the species barrier and are now being transmitted from human to human.

    The fact that these viruses have adapted to humans, and that humans have no immunity to them, means that they will potentially continue to adapt to the point that they become very contagious and lethal. The chance of this happening increases exponentially as more people get infected.

    It may be over-hype on the part of the media, but the more aware people are, the more steps they will take to prevent the spread of infection, which is a good thing. Of course, the danger with over-hype is that we all quickly become skeptical and complacent.

    So at the moment you think you can relax, because Swine Flu is only likely to kill you if your immune system is weak. However, asymptomatic carriers provide the virus with ideal conditions to mutate further, so it’s a good idea to try to see through the hype and listen to the scientists, because they’ll tell you when you really have to start worrying.

    http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/faq/en/index.html#q11

  • http://www.nitch.ca Andrew Lane

    Lots of nice points, Martin. I especially agree with your final point that they’ll let us know when we really need to worry. Awareness is certainly key as another commenter pointed out, but I think we’ve gone beyond awareness and are now simply dealing with audience retention tactics.

  • http://blog.zakirhemraj.com Zakir Hemraj

    So, Swine Flu means that I can’t eat pork, right? ;)

    Great post, Laner.